Global Editorial Team

Editorial leadership for responsible scholarly publishing.

INOVASI ANALISIS DATA supports an international editorial network committed to academic integrity, peer-review quality, editorial independence, and responsible open access dissemination across disciplines.

International Editorial Governance

The Global Editorial Team page presents IAD’s editorial governance framework, editorial responsibilities, and standards for supporting journals, reviewers, editors, authors, and scholarly communities.

IAD encourages editorial participation based on academic expertise, ethical awareness, peer-review experience, disciplinary relevance, and commitment to transparent journal management.

Professional and standards-oriented editorial collaboration. Editorial roles are designed to support manuscript quality, fair review, responsible publication decisions, policy alignment, and the long-term credibility of the scholarly record.
Editorial Standards

Core responsibilities of the editorial network

IAD promotes a structured editorial environment that supports responsible decision-making, transparent workflows, and quality assurance.

Editorial Independence

Editorial decisions should be based on scholarly merit, relevance, ethical compliance, and peer-review assessment.

Peer Review Integrity

Editors support fair, confidential, constructive, and timely peer-review processes across IAD journals.

Ethical Publishing

The editorial network supports responsible authorship, conflict disclosure, originality, corrections, and publication ethics.

Global Collaboration

International participation strengthens academic diversity, disciplinary coverage, and responsible scholarly communication.

Editorial Structure

Roles within the IAD editorial ecosystem

Editorial roles may vary by journal, discipline, and publication workflow. The structure below describes common responsibilities in IAD journal governance.

Editor-in-Chief

Provides scholarly leadership, safeguards journal scope, oversees editorial quality, and ensures responsible publication decisions.

Managing Editor

Coordinates editorial workflows, communication, manuscript tracking, publication schedules, and operational quality control.

Associate Editors

Support manuscript screening, reviewer selection, review evaluation, and recommendations within their areas of expertise.

Editorial Board Members

Contribute disciplinary expertise, peer-review support, policy advice, and scholarly visibility for the journal.

Reviewers

Provide independent, constructive, confidential, and evidence-based manuscript assessments.

Advisory Members

Offer strategic input on journal development, ethics, academic collaboration, and international standards.

This page describes IAD’s editorial governance framework. Individual journal editorial boards, names, affiliations, and roles may be displayed on each journal’s official page according to journal-specific appointments and confirmations.
Editorial Directory

Confirmed editorial leadership

Editors listed below are displayed once to avoid repeated profiles across journals. Additional editorial board members will be updated after official confirmation.

Confirmed Editor-in-Chief / Editorial Leadership
This directory presents confirmed editorial leadership profiles and avoids displaying the same editor repeatedly across multiple journals. Additional editors, advisory members, section editors, and reviewer board members will be updated after official verification.
Editorial Principles

Principles guiding IAD editorial practice

IAD promotes editorial culture based on academic responsibility, transparency, fairness, and contribution to the scholarly record.

Fairness and impartiality Manuscripts should be assessed based on quality, originality, relevance, and ethical compliance.
Confidentiality Editors and reviewers should maintain confidentiality throughout the editorial and review process.
Conflict management Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed and managed appropriately.
Research integrity Editors should respond responsibly to concerns related to plagiarism, data integrity, authorship, and corrections.
Reviewer quality Peer review should be constructive, evidence-based, respectful, and aligned with journal scope.
Continuous improvement IAD supports ongoing improvement in journal governance, metadata quality, policy clarity, and editorial workflows.

Join the IAD editorial network

IAD welcomes qualified researchers, academics, reviewers, and editorial professionals interested in contributing to responsible scholarly publishing, journal development, peer-review quality, and international academic collaboration.